Launch human- or AI-judged benchmarks, compare prompts and models, and choose what to keep public, private, or invite-only — all in one streamlined workflow.
Benchmarks
Human or AI judges
Comparisons
Prompts & LLMs
Controls
Public or invite-only
Scenario
User as judge
LLM-as-judge
Stack multiple judges and scoring rubrics.
Problem
Ad-hoc spreadsheets, unclear scoring, and opaque sharing make it hard to trust which prompt or model is actually better. Results often stay siloed or stale.
Solution
Define rubrics once, invite human judges or plug in LLM judges, and compare prompts or models side-by-side. Publish results or keep them private with controlled access.
Benchmarks
Run human-in-the-loop studies, automate scoring with model judges, and keep visibility aligned with your org needs.
Collect structured ratings from stakeholders or invited panels with clear instructions and scoring rubrics.
Use one or multiple LLMs as evaluators with custom prompts, bias guards, and calibration examples.
Compare prompts, model families, and versions across the same dataset to see which wins for your use-case.
Ship public leaderboards or keep everything private with invite-only access and expiring links.
Import datasets, define evaluation criteria once, and reuse them across prompts or model candidates.
Share read-only dashboards, export CSVs, or embed summaries for decision-makers.
Workflow
A guided flow that takes you from dataset to decisions with optional human or model judges.
Import datasets or upload examples, set rubrics, and outline what “good” looks like for your specific use-case.
Invite reviewers or configure model judges with calibration prompts and safeguards for fairness.
A/B prompts, swap LLMs, and track scores with confidence intervals and qualitative notes in one place.
Generate public leaderboards or keep reports invite-only with audit-ready exports for stakeholders.
Overall score
Get early access
Tell us about your use-case and we’ll prioritize the benchmarks and model judges that matter most to you.